Field and Aims: The International Police Organization has been established to establish cooperation and coordination between the national police of member states. In order to achieve its goals, the organization issues various notices, headed by a Red notice, which is similar to an international arrest warrant for defendants and criminals. According to Article 2 of the Interpol Charter, the organization must abide by the spirit of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. There is a question, what mechanism is envisaged in Interpol to guarantee human rights? Method: The present study is qualitative and according to the nature of the subject, in terms of practical purpose and in terms of collecting information by documentary method and by studying valid laws and sources and the information obtained is descriptive-analytical. Findings: Considering that some authoritarian governments used Interpol as a tool to pursue and gain access to their opponents, who were in fact only politically charged, some individuals and organizations have consistently and logically criticized this for the past two decades. And stressed the need to develop a mechanism to respect the human rights of individuals. Therefore, with the amendments made to the Articles of Association of the Interpol Files Control Commission, this commission has a quasi-judicial jurisdiction and composition, and individuals can complain to this commission and the Commission's decisions and decisions for Interpol bodies and member states regarding the removal of processing information. Is applicable in Interpol. Conclusion: By studying and analyzing the rules and structure of the commission and especially the sample of votes issued in this research, we come to the conclusion that the commission always tries to maintain impartiality, protect and guarantee the human rights of individuals.